BMI vs Waist Measurement vs WHR
Dec. 8th, 2009 12:16 amHere's the thing: I have a BMI (Body Mass Index) of 28.6; I have a waist measurement of 37"/94cm; I have a WHR (Waist to Hip Ratio) of .88.
According to the BMI (Body Mass Index), I'm overweight.
According to my waist measurement alone, I'm not.
According to my WHR, I'm not.
Which one of these three has been getting the most press recently as an indicator of being overweight?
[BTW, occasionally an article on being overweight or obese will note that muscular people are more likely to be miscategorized by BMI as being overweight, while older people are more likely to be miscategorized by BMI as being normal or underweight. Occasionally.]
ETA: My doctor does not consider me to be overweight. My insurance company might.
According to the BMI (Body Mass Index), I'm overweight.
According to my waist measurement alone, I'm not.
According to my WHR, I'm not.
Which one of these three has been getting the most press recently as an indicator of being overweight?
[BTW, occasionally an article on being overweight or obese will note that muscular people are more likely to be miscategorized by BMI as being overweight, while older people are more likely to be miscategorized by BMI as being normal or underweight. Occasionally.]
ETA: My doctor does not consider me to be overweight. My insurance company might.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 07:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 08:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 11:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 11:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 01:26 pm (UTC)Another point about visceral fat that I found interesting is:
"Researchers also have found that abdominal fat cells aren't just dormant energy waiting to be burned up. The cells are active, producing hormones and other substances that can affect your health."
Now that's a little unsettling to me.
Marion
no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 02:08 pm (UTC)When swimming, I sink. Always have. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 02:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 04:47 pm (UTC)